Clarity in every signal.
To build a future where security teams can uncover hidden threats with clarity, confidence, and intelligence.
See What Others Miss.
THEVOR Intelligence brings evidence-governed threat hunting into focus, transforming MITRE ATT&CK hypotheses into grounded Sigma detections, controlled SIEM searches, and analyst-reviewable findings.
Purpose-built around trust, precise reasoning, actionable intelligence and clear decision-making.
To build a future where security teams can uncover hidden threats with clarity, confidence, and intelligence.
We help security teams find hidden threats, turn data into meaningful insights, and make better security decisions.
Detection engineering is more than writing a query. The system needs to know which behaviors matter, which telemetry actually exists, and whether a match constitutes defensible evidence.
Read the architecture notes ↗Telemetry availability, environment context and provenance are evaluated before detection content is approved for generation.
Source & environment groundingEligibility, schema, field compatibility, rule checks and pre-execution safety are governed outside the language model.
Eligibility & validation gatesRaw matches remain candidate evidence. Triage assists prioritization without silently declaring incidents or closing cases.
Human-reviewed outcomesExplore the main evidence-to-action stages of the implemented research platform. Select a stage for its responsibilities and evaluation boundary.
Model generation, deterministic validators, runtime observations and analyst verdicts are separate evidence types. Passing one gate never implies confirmed compromise.
Walk through an illustrative PowerShell investigation using four deliberately synthetic events. No live SIEM, hosted LLM, or XGBoost model is called.
Authentic captures from the original platform showcase its hypothesis reasoning, Sigma workflows and analyst investigation surfaces.
Authentic captures only · No fabricated dashboard images · Video must be reviewed for credentials or personal data before publication
These numbers refer to distinct research evaluations. A parser-accepted rule is not a confirmed detection, and a synthetic demo is not a live SIEM validation.
Evaluation limitations ↗223/286 adapted outputs passed the recorded no-blocking-pySigma-issues gate. This is not live incident-detection accuracy.
View LLM evaluation ↗Organization-held-out performance declines. The classifier supports analyst triage only, with an explicit heuristic fallback when fields are incompatible.
Recorded offline metrics, SIEM execution studies and local integration tests are complementary, not an overall “autonomous threat detection accuracy.” See the repository and Phase 2 report for methodology and limitations.
A research-grade pipeline and a product-oriented interface, joined by explicit evidence contracts and source-aware execution boundaries.
Behavioral knowledge and portable detection content.
Task-specific model benchmark; separately configured inference service.
Rule checking with separately governed execution controls.
Compiled searches, runtime recording, candidate evidence review.
Frozen classifier with feature compatibility and honest fallback.
Analyst-facing interface, services, persistence and reporting.
For cybersecurity discussions, threat intelligence, AI collaboration and platform inquiries, connect with THEVOR Intelligence.
thevor.intelligence@gmail.com
Send an email ↗Inspect the code, explore the safe interactive investigation, or open the protected platform when a deployment has been configured.